<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/">
  <channel>
    <title>EconStor Collection: Diskussionspapiere "Innovationssysteme und Policy-Analyse", Fraunhofer ISI</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10419/28449</link>
    <description />
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li resource="http://hdl.handle.net/10419/72145" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://hdl.handle.net/10419/72145" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://hdl.handle.net/10419/60196" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://hdl.handle.net/10419/60196" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel>
  <textInput>
    <title>The Collection's search engine</title>
    <description>Search the Channel</description>
    <name>search</name>
    <link>http://www.econstor.eu/simple-search</link>
  </textInput>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10419/72145">
    <title>Systematic analysis of coverage and usage of conference proceedings in web of science: Subproject in the Kompetenzzentrum Bibliometrie</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10419/72145</link>
    <description>Title: Systematic analysis of coverage and usage of conference proceedings in web of science: Subproject in the Kompetenzzentrum Bibliometrie
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Michels, Carolin; Fu, Junying
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: [Introduction ...] The last part of this report describes how conference proceedings in general influence various types of bibliometric indicators. We take a look at different countries and analyze whether they profit or suffer from the inclusion of conference proceedings. Also, we compare the indicator values for various fields. This results in an overview of types of analyses, for which an in- or exclusion of conference proceedings might be advisable or not. The remainder of this report is structured as follows: Section 2 gives an overview of the state of the art and compares literature that has already dealt with the database coverage of conference proceedings and their influence on bibliometric indicators. Furthermore, the approach taken in this report and necessary definitions are explained. To better illustrate the different results of bibliometric indicators, we calculate different bibliometric indicators for five countries and compare the results for conference proceedings and journal publications in Section 3. Section 4 consists of two parts. The first part, Descriptive Analysis, shows the results for the quantitative assessment of the proceedings in the database. Using these findings as a basis, we then deduce the Implications for Bibliometric Analyses in the second part. The final section summarizes our findings and shows possibilities for future work.</description>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10419/72145">
    <title>Systematic analysis of coverage and usage of conference proceedings in web of science: Subproject in the Kompetenzzentrum Bibliometrie</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10419/72145</link>
    <description>Title: Systematic analysis of coverage and usage of conference proceedings in web of science: Subproject in the Kompetenzzentrum Bibliometrie
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Michels, Carolin; Fu, Junying
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: [Introduction ...] The last part of this report describes how conference proceedings in general influence various types of bibliometric indicators. We take a look at different countries and analyze whether they profit or suffer from the inclusion of conference proceedings. Also, we compare the indicator values for various fields. This results in an overview of types of analyses, for which an in- or exclusion of conference proceedings might be advisable or not. The remainder of this report is structured as follows: Section 2 gives an overview of the state of the art and compares literature that has already dealt with the database coverage of conference proceedings and their influence on bibliometric indicators. Furthermore, the approach taken in this report and necessary definitions are explained. To better illustrate the different results of bibliometric indicators, we calculate different bibliometric indicators for five countries and compare the results for conference proceedings and journal publications in Section 3. Section 4 consists of two parts. The first part, Descriptive Analysis, shows the results for the quantitative assessment of the proceedings in the database. Using these findings as a basis, we then deduce the Implications for Bibliometric Analyses in the second part. The final section summarizes our findings and shows possibilities for future work.</description>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10419/60196">
    <title>Identification of university-based patents: A new large-scale approach</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10419/60196</link>
    <description>Title: Identification of university-based patents: A new large-scale approach
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Dornbusch, Friedrich; Schmoch, Ulrich; Schulze, Nicole; Bethke, Nadine
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: This paper described a method to consistently and automatically identify all university-based patents by matching the names of inventors on patent filings with authors of scientific publications. This methodological procedure can be adjusted for different pur-poses. Handling selection criteria rigorously allows us to generate a dataset of universi-ty-based patents with high precision. A less restrictive setting of selection criteria yields a higher coverage in terms of the overall picture and total numbers of academic pa-tents. Using the authors of scientific publications allows us to identify research-active staff at universities without having to continuously compile and update staff lists for comparison with inventor lists. In particular, the author lists also cover research-active staff without official teaching functions who are often not covered by the official staff lists.</description>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10419/60196">
    <title>Identification of university-based patents: A new large-scale approach</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10419/60196</link>
    <description>Title: Identification of university-based patents: A new large-scale approach
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Dornbusch, Friedrich; Schmoch, Ulrich; Schulze, Nicole; Bethke, Nadine
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: This paper described a method to consistently and automatically identify all university-based patents by matching the names of inventors on patent filings with authors of scientific publications. This methodological procedure can be adjusted for different pur-poses. Handling selection criteria rigorously allows us to generate a dataset of universi-ty-based patents with high precision. A less restrictive setting of selection criteria yields a higher coverage in terms of the overall picture and total numbers of academic pa-tents. Using the authors of scientific publications allows us to identify research-active staff at universities without having to continuously compile and update staff lists for comparison with inventor lists. In particular, the author lists also cover research-active staff without official teaching functions who are often not covered by the official staff lists.</description>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

