@techreport{Gonzalez-Diaz2011notion,
abstract = {Often, perfect bayesian equilibrium is loosely defined by stating that players should be sequentially rational given some beliefs in which Bayes rule is applied whenever possible. We show that there are games in which it is not clear what whenever possible means. Then, we provide a simple definition of perfect bayesian equilibrium for general extensive games that refines both weak perfect equilibrium and subgame perfect equilibrium.},
address = {Evanston},
author = {Julio Gonz\'{a}lez-D\'{\i}az and Miguel A. Mel\'{e}ndez-Jim\'{e}nez},
copyright = {http://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen},
keywords = {C72; 330; non-cooperative game theory; equilibrium concepts; perfect bayesian; Bayes rule},
language = {eng},
number = {1446},
publisher = {Northwestern Univ., Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science},
title = {On the notion of perfect bayesian equilibrium},
type = {Discussion Paper, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science},
url = {http://hdl.handle.net/10419/59628},
year = {2011}
}
