@techreport{Audretsch2009Technological,
abstract = {Industrialization has long been seen as the answer to underdevelopment and poverty. First this led countries to follow protectionist import substitution policies but as these failed developing countries have opened up to trade and FDI and tried to follow strategies of export driven industrialization. If we consider the share of non-OECD countries in global trade in manufactures, this has been a big success. But has it? Developed countries still retain their competitive advantage in the innovative and fast growing industries of the future and for every success story in Asia there are at least two tales of woo in Africa. In this paper we present a two region product life cycle model of global specialization and trade. In it we analyse the impact of three major shocks to the gradually globalizing and integrating world economy and show that these shocks have caused a transition in the global specialization pattern.},
address = {Helsinki},
author = {David B. Audretsch and Mark Sanders},
copyright = {http://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen},
isbn = {978-92-9230-229-0},
keywords = {F01; J31; O1; P0; 330; globalization; innovation; trade; development; Globalisierung; Technischer Fortschritt; Internationale Arbeitsteilung; Entwicklung},
language = {eng},
number = {2009.50},
publisher = {UNU-WIDER},
title = {Technological innovation, entrepreneurship and development},
type = {Research paper / UNU-WIDER},
url = {http://hdl.handle.net/10419/45086},
year = {2009}
}
