@techreport{Lutz2002Trade,
abstract = {The ongoing discussion of U.S.-Japanese trade relations suggests that national
differences such as in the institutional environment may be relevant for assessing international
trade policies. However, economic trade theory often assumes countries to be organized
around common notions of complete markets. This paper compares two alternative modes of
trade policy analysis by juxtaposing the \textquotedblleft{}economic\textquotedblright{} view inherent in Gene Grossman's work
on \textquotedblleft{}Japan's Innovation and Trade\textquotedblright{} with the \textquotedblleft{}political\textquotedblright{} view of \textquotedblleft{}Japanese-American
Relations\textquotedblright{} expressed by Chalmers Johnson. A synthesis is attempted with the help of some
remarks on \textquotedblleft{}New Trade Theory's Implications for Policy Analysis\textquotedblright{} by John Pomery.},
address = {Bonn},
author = {Stefan Lutz},
copyright = {http://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen},
keywords = {A12; B41; F10; 330; trade theory; policy; institutional factors; Au\ss{}enwirtschaftspolitik; Internationale Wirtschaftsbeziehungen; Komparativer Kostenvorteil; Institutionalismus; Neue Au\ss{}enhandelsthe},
language = {eng},
number = {B 25-2002},
publisher = {ZEI},
title = {Trade policy: 'institutional' vs. 'economic' factors},
type = {ZEI working paper},
url = {http://hdl.handle.net/10419/39632},
year = {2002}
}
