@techreport{Tannenwald2004Interstate,
abstract = {This paper compares states in terms of their relative fiscal capacity, fiscal need, fiscal comfort,
and tax effort in state fiscal year 1999 (FY1999). It is the most recent in a series initiated by the
U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (ACIR) in 1962. As in previous
studies, the authors use the representative tax system and representative expenditure system
methodologies in their analysis. Compared with FY1997, the authors find less interstate
disparity in fiscal capacity, fiscal need, and fiscal comfort. However, such disparity, though
diminished, remains substantial. The New England and Mid-Atlantic regions remain the most
?fiscally comfortable,? while the East South Central and West South Central regions are still the
most ?fiscally stressed.?},
author = {Robert Tannenwald and Nicholas Turner},
copyright = {http://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen},
keywords = {H71; H72; 330; state and local government taxation ; state and local government expenditure; L\"{a}nderfinanzen; Steueraufkommen; \"{O}ffentliche Einnahmen; Sch\"{a}tzung; Index; USA},
language = {eng},
number = {04,9},
title = {Interstate Fiscal Disparity in State Fiscal Year 1999},
type = {Public policy discussion papers / Federal Reserve Bank of Boston},
url = {http://hdl.handle.net/10419/23455},
year = {2004}
}
