@techreport{Srensen2005pluralism,
abstract = {A core question in the contemporary debate on distributive justice is how the fair distribution
of income is affected by differences in talent and effort. Important theories of distributive
justice, such as strict egalitarianism, liberal egalitarianism and libertarianism, all give
different answers to this question. This paper presents the results from a version of the
dictator game where the distribution phase is preceded by a production phase. Each player?s
contribution is a result of an exogenously given talent and a chosen effort. We estimate
simultaneously the prevalence of three main principles of distributive justice among the
players as well as the distribution of weights they attach to fairness considerations.},
author = {Erik \O{}. S\o{}rensen and Astri D. Hole and Alexander W. Cappelen and Bertil Tungodden},
copyright = {http://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen},
keywords = {D63; 330; Verm\"{o}gensverteilung; Verteilungsgerechtigkeit; Verteilungstheorie; Qualifikation; Leistungsmotivation; Spieltheorie},
language = {eng},
number = {1611},
title = {The pluralism of fairness ideals : an experimental approach},
type = {CESifo working papers},
url = {http://hdl.handle.net/10419/19075},
year = {2005}
}
